

However, I also appreciate the original story with the characters (illustrations only) being mice, because I think it is very important for kids to see these relationships in literature like the things read, and a lot of kids do enjoy books where animals act like people. I think this is a necessary change, especially since Bobby and Jamie are also depicted as people of different races.

It's important to note that all later editions of the book feature people instead of mice as the main characters, where the story stays the same. Some people will face a new wedding of a loved one, and sometimes that loved one will marry someone of their same gender, and it shouldn't affect family relationships because love is what makes a family. It shows people (or mice in this case) handling conflict and represents reality. Overall this is a story of family love and of learning to adapt to change, which is an issue that many children have to learn to handle. Will she still be his favorite niece? Will they still be able to do the things they did before? Told using anthropomorphic mice, Chloe is a young girl who doesn't know what the future holds when her uncle Bobby announces his upcoming wedding. Because they do in the real world, and not everything is about a specific identity all the time.) Yes, we need the stories that are about the LGBT (or POC or disability or or or) experience, but I also just want to see stories where these people/animals exist. OL9342206W Pages 42 Partner Innodata Pdf_module_version 0.0.15 Ppi 360 Rcs_key 24143 Republisher_date 20211011192439 Republisher_operator Republisher_time 267 Scandate 20211007103502 Scanner Scanningcenter cebu Scribe3_search_catalog isbn Scribe3_search_id 9780399247125 Tts_version 4.Uncle Bobby's Wedding is a good example of incidental LGBTQ+ representation in picture books (side note, I'm super big on incidental representation. Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 13:16:30 Boxid IA40255910 Camera Sony Alpha-A6300 (Control) Collection_set printdisabled External-identifier
